Attorneys for Telegram are as soon as once more pushing again towards the US Securities and Trade Fee (SEC). At this time, they’ve responded to the SEC’s newest fling that opposed its request for readability relating to the scope of the court docket’s resolution barring the distribution of GRAM tokens.
The messaging platform filed a response to Choose Castel dated March 31, writing that the SEC’s injunction earlier as we speak was unwarranted. Additional, they’re asking the federal court docket to disclaim the regulator’s movement to implement a complete ban, including that Telegram’s request isn’t “procedurally barred.”
This was a response to the SEC’s letter, which referred to Telegram’s request for readability as legally undeserving and procedurally barred.
“In truth, courts have modified injunctions after a request for clarification in related circumstances. The modification of the injunction will protect the established order by clarifying for the events exactly what [defendant] is, and isn’t, enjoined from . . . [and] is subsequently throughout the scope of this court docket’s authority,” the assertion additional reads.
Telegram additionally argues that the SEC has by no means moved to strike its protection, citing the Supreme Court docket’s resolution within the Morrison case, which offers international firms with a major protection towards claims made below the US federal securities legal guidelines.
Telegram nonetheless seeks exemption for non-US traders
The submitting defined that the SEC seeks to ‘improperly’ broaden the geographic scope of native legal guidelines based mostly solely on the reasoning that its Gram token could possibly be in the end bought by US consumers sooner or later. Additional supporting its claims, the regulator mentioned that after the Grams had been delivered, the token consumers and Telegram itself would be capable of promote billions of those tokens into the US by means of secondary market exercise.
This goes towards Supreme Court docket’s resolution, Telegram claims, which clearly limits the authority of the US federal legal guidelines to use solely to “transactions in securities listed on home exchanges” and “home transactions in different securities.”
“That’s merely a repackaging of the now-defunct “conducts and results” take a look at,” mentioned Telegram, referencing the $1.7 billion it raised utilizing a Easy Settlement for Future Tokens (SAFT) framework.
Extra importantly, Telegram nonetheless seeks the court docket’s order to be clarified to exclude the supply of its Grams to non-US purchasers.
Telegram appealed the court docket on Friday, searching for readability whether or not the preliminary injunction issued by Choose Kevin Castel held jurisdiction outdoors of the USA.